Kernerman Dictionary News • Number 12 • July 2004
From Milon ha-Hoveh
to Milon Sapir
The main innovation of Milon ha-Hoveh was in presenting the verbs in the present participle form, as opposed to other dictionaries that inscribe the verbs according to their past form. It can be assumed that, with the name Dictionary of the Present, the editors wanted to point to this quality of their dictionary and perhaps also to hint it is up to date in accord with the publication date.
Six years later a new dictionary appeared, Milon Sapir, whose chief editor was the publisher Eitan Avnion, and the scientific editorial team included Professor Raphael Nir, Shoshana Bahat (who edited MH with Mordechai Mishor) and Dr Yitzhak Shlesinger. This dictionary had a similar pattern to its predecessor, namely, edited in ha-Hoveh method for the lexicographic entries of the verbs.
On the one hand, there are a number of similarities in these two dictionaries, but on the other hand there are a number of differences.
The most prominent innovation in the dictionary of Bahat and Mishor is, then, editing the verbs according to the present tense form. The editors gave in the preface several reasons for this method, some pragmatic – for ease of use, and some editorial – considerations stemming from the ambiguity of the Hebrew present tense form, which often appears both as a verb and as a noun or an adjective.
The editors adopted this editing method in MS. The contribution of this dictionary to those involved with Hebrew language research and to anyone interested in using a dictionary from time to time is primarily its scope: MH has 21,000 entries whereas MS contains over 100,000 main and sub-entries (the MH editors were sparing with sub-entries while the editors of MS treated sub-entries at length).
the increase in the number of entries
in MS stems also from a grammatical-linguistic decision concerning the
division into grammatical categories. Thus, for example, two entries for mukpa
(frozen): first, the verb, including tense inflections (hukpa,
yukpa / was/will be frozen), then the adjective, including the gender and
number inflections (mukpa, mukpet, mukpaim, mukpaot / is/are frozen).
This division of the present tense form into two entries according to their
grammatical category reflects the grammatical system of modern Hebrew, which
is indeed the main aim of MS.
K Dictionaries Ltd